tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20341995.post1525875423804087962..comments2024-02-05T03:46:55.714-05:00Comments on A whole lot of soles...: The iPod Nano fitness and the Garmin killeryumkehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04326728444383668883noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20341995.post-80212078760626321412011-10-07T09:03:02.852-04:002011-10-07T09:03:02.852-04:00Thanks for your comments. Brian, the newer Garmin ...Thanks for your comments. Brian, the newer Garmin models are pretty smoking. Love them.<br />305s going for $150 is a sweet deal.<br /><br />And hello Leah, nice to see you round these parts!yumkehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04326728444383668883noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20341995.post-77496658562804551112011-10-06T16:52:35.424-04:002011-10-06T16:52:35.424-04:00oh that's very interesting!
I wonder how acc...oh that's very interesting! <br /><br />I wonder how accurate it would be though. But man that is nice. not having to wait for a freakin' gps signal on the garmin would be nice. <br /><br />Not that I'm running that much anymore, but in theory the only thing I used my garmin for was distance and pace. If I coudl do that on there (and separate by mile?) that would be great!LeahChttp://jasonleahrun.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20341995.post-53683670932557846932011-10-05T13:13:54.775-04:002011-10-05T13:13:54.775-04:00Hmm. I love my 305 which is the only GPS watch I&#...Hmm. I love my 305 which is the only GPS watch I've owned. I can't imagine running without it. I also like all of the data. I agree though, a runner just starting out will likely be better off with the nano, especially at that price. FWIW, my Garmin only costs $150 at Costco.macnichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13756849604085886005noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20341995.post-29287982443396620902011-10-05T00:30:36.018-04:002011-10-05T00:30:36.018-04:00Seems like a cool idea as long as I can wear it on...Seems like a cool idea as long as I can wear it on my wrist to obsessively check distance/pace.<br /><br />I have a Garmin Forerunner 201. Pretty basic, but except for spotty satellite reception/accuracy compared to the newer models, I do like it. <br /><br />But, since I mostly just use the basic features, anyway, I would definitely consider the Nano fitness when it's time to replace it (Brianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02814804554194390618noreply@blogger.com